<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: more metathinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://info-fetishist.org/2007/12/22/more-metathinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://info-fetishist.org/2007/12/22/more-metathinking/</link>
	<description>yeah, it's long -- I didn't have time to make it shorter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sara J</title>
		<link>http://info-fetishist.org/2007/12/22/more-metathinking/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sara J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infofetishist.wordpress.com/2007/12/22/more-metathinking/#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post. I have never been a good debater, perhaps it takes training. I can talk fast but not always think fast.  However I think of Aristotle who observed that audiences are often (perhaps more and more often nowadays) persuaded by emotion not by logic. So a logical and fast debater is relying on logic, which is not what motivates most folks.  Otherwise advertisers would quit using photos.  Smithsonian magazine in October 2007 has an article on &quot;In the name of the law: how to win arguments without really trying&quot; by Richard Conniff.  For example, Conniff mentions someting called &quot;Godwin&#039;s Law&quot; which &quot;holds that the longer an argument drags on, the likelier someone will stoop to a Hitler or Nazi analogy&quot; (128).  Conniff doesn&#039;t mean real, i.e. trained, debaters, but average folks.  And aren&#039;t the average folks the ones in my class?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I have never been a good debater, perhaps it takes training. I can talk fast but not always think fast.  However I think of Aristotle who observed that audiences are often (perhaps more and more often nowadays) persuaded by emotion not by logic. So a logical and fast debater is relying on logic, which is not what motivates most folks.  Otherwise advertisers would quit using photos.  Smithsonian magazine in October 2007 has an article on &#8220;In the name of the law: how to win arguments without really trying&#8221; by Richard Conniff.  For example, Conniff mentions someting called &#8220;Godwin&#8217;s Law&#8221; which &#8220;holds that the longer an argument drags on, the likelier someone will stoop to a Hitler or Nazi analogy&#8221; (128).  Conniff doesn&#8217;t mean real, i.e. trained, debaters, but average folks.  And aren&#8217;t the average folks the ones in my class?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

