<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital content for free!  (semi-free)  (or something)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://info-fetishist.org/2008/04/23/digital-content-semi-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://info-fetishist.org/2008/04/23/digital-content-semi-free/</link>
	<description>yeah, it's long -- I didn't have time to make it shorter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:44:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne-Marie</title>
		<link>http://info-fetishist.org/2008/04/23/digital-content-semi-free/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne-Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infofetishist.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Huh. Yeah, that&#039;s pretty much the same, isn&#039;t it.  I guess the snarky way of looking at it is that one thing they&#039;re doing differently is get noticed.  They&#039;ve been off my radar for a while, but I&#039;ve seen a zillion mentions of it this time around, and that wasn&#039;t the case before.  I think you&#039;re on the money to point to the widgets -- offering something more of value to the content creators they&#039;re targeting than links in the hopes of getting some buzz and some use?  That makes some sense to me.  Especially given that links is something they can&#039;t now nor will they ever do better than Wikipedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. Yeah, that&#8217;s pretty much the same, isn&#8217;t it.  I guess the snarky way of looking at it is that one thing they&#8217;re doing differently is get noticed.  They&#8217;ve been off my radar for a while, but I&#8217;ve seen a zillion mentions of it this time around, and that wasn&#8217;t the case before.  I think you&#8217;re on the money to point to the widgets &#8212; offering something more of value to the content creators they&#8217;re targeting than links in the hopes of getting some buzz and some use?  That makes some sense to me.  Especially given that links is something they can&#8217;t now nor will they ever do better than Wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caleb</title>
		<link>http://info-fetishist.org/2008/04/23/digital-content-semi-free/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infofetishist.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been trying to sort out what Britannica is doing differently from what they launched last year (http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-01-04-n57.html) and I was struck by the widgetization of the main text of their articles inside their site. I am inclined to dislike it, but I&#039;m not sure yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to sort out what Britannica is doing differently from what they launched last year (<a href="http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-01-04-n57.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-01-04-n57.html</a>) and I was struck by the widgetization of the main text of their articles inside their site. I am inclined to dislike it, but I&#8217;m not sure yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
