<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I never thought I&#8217;d really have to update those screenshots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://info-fetishist.org/2008/07/31/new_delicious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://info-fetishist.org/2008/07/31/new_delicious/</link>
	<description>yeah, it's long -- I didn't have time to make it shorter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:31:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: calebtr</title>
		<link>http://info-fetishist.org/2008/07/31/new_delicious/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[calebtr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infofetishist.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another thing that&#039;s different is that when you&#039;re focused on a tag, clicking on a &quot;Related tag&quot; ANDs the related tag to the current tag. 

Previously, clicking the related tag would change the focus to that tag. If you wanted to AND the terms,you had to work hard to mouse over and click on the &quot;+&quot; part of the link.

I don&#039;t care much for the look - welcome to the 1980s - but I do like that one-to-three letter links are easier to click on because of the extra padding.

And I miss the non-conformist URL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing that&#8217;s different is that when you&#8217;re focused on a tag, clicking on a &#8220;Related tag&#8221; ANDs the related tag to the current tag. </p>
<p>Previously, clicking the related tag would change the focus to that tag. If you wanted to AND the terms,you had to work hard to mouse over and click on the &#8220;+&#8221; part of the link.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care much for the look &#8211; welcome to the 1980s &#8211; but I do like that one-to-three letter links are easier to click on because of the extra padding.</p>
<p>And I miss the non-conformist URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memo</title>
		<link>http://info-fetishist.org/2008/07/31/new_delicious/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Memo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infofetishist.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love it! I&#039;m graphically inclined so this move is definitely a thumbs up for me. I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adaptiveblue.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BlueOrganizer&lt;/a&gt; as my main bookmarking add-on because I can add a graphic to the bookmark (it&#039;s just one of its many features) but have always like del.icio.us for its simplicity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it! I&#8217;m graphically inclined so this move is definitely a thumbs up for me. I use <a href="http://www.adaptiveblue.com/" rel="nofollow">BlueOrganizer</a> as my main bookmarking add-on because I can add a graphic to the bookmark (it&#8217;s just one of its many features) but have always like del.icio.us for its simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara J</title>
		<link>http://info-fetishist.org/2008/07/31/new_delicious/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sara J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infofetishist.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What? When did this happen?  At least the spelling is more normal, which helps.  Well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? When did this happen?  At least the spelling is more normal, which helps.  Well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

