So, according to TechCrunch in 2010, Bill Gates thinks that by 2015, people won’t have to go away to college anymore because
Five years from now on the web for free you’ll be able to find the best lectures in the world…. It will be better than any single university.
Fast forward to this year and Harvard and MIT launch edX, designed to bring an interactive course experience to anyone with an Internet connection (so, not just lectures) – building a “global community of learners” and strengthening programs back on campus as well.
Online education and it’s potential to disrupt college as we know it is a talked-about thing, is what I am saying.
But despite that, I have never really thought about this.
(via Walking Paper)
It’s kind of a longish video with a pace that is measured, or slow – so if you didn’t read it basically it seems to be a platform that manages online course offerings – potential teachers can upload their classes, potential students can find and sign up for classes. There’s some consistency in offerings – they’re all one-day, in-person workshops that cost $20.
Here’s the thing, I can see this working with enough critical mass — but I’m not sure I can see it working on a college campus. But I think it should work on a college campus – like, I can see it working on a campus that’s not all that different than the ones we have. Why? Well, reasons…
- We have a lot of really smart students who know how to do stuff. We also have a lot of really smart faculty and staff who know how to do stuff, but I haven’t figured out yet if it works better in my head to be something bringing the whole community together – building a learning community that encompasses the physical community — or if it’s better as a student-teaching-students thing.
- We have students (and faculty and staff) who have a lot of interests – who want to learn how to do stuff.
- We talk a lot about high impact educational practices – those practices that increase student success and engagement. What’s important about these practices isn’t so much “if students get these experiences then school will be easier for our students” so much as “if students get these experiences then they’ll develop the networks, resources and resilience to get through the tough parts, stay in school and ultimately figure out how to succeed. Taking on the teaching role doesn’t directly fit any of these practices, but it seems to fit in spirit — basically, if the teaching feels like it’s part of what makes the community the community, then participating would increase attachment to the community.
But on the other hand, other reasons …
When school pressures hit, there’s very little that survives. Which is what I mean when I say I can see this working on a college that is similar but not exactly the same as what I see outside my window. (or what I would see if I had a window). Basically, what I mean here is that I find it hard to see our students finding time for this kind of, well, dabbling a lot of the time — they can use working out or even parties as a legit reason not to study — one keeps you healthy and the other keeps you in friends – but taking a class on fixing your bike? No, that I can’t see being treated as a legit reason not to focus on the classes and learning you’re actually paying for.
And I’m not sure what that means – I can easily see something like this working with my students just after they leave college. Well, not easily, but realistically, I can imagine this kind of ecosystem taking root. In college, on the other hand, it’s a lot harder. I’m not sure what I think about that.
But here’s the thing – this seems like a great thing for libraries to manage. This is information literacy, browsing, exploration and curiosity. Exactly the kind of thing we are all about in college – but think about the ecosystem we build to support it. What’s missing? This kind of collaborative sharing of expertise — the people networks.
Which brings it back to he discussions of online learning I started with – see, I’m pulling it back around. Seriously, I’m as surprised as you are.
One thing that got me (and really, almost everyone else) two years ago when that Bill Gates quote appeared was just what a top-down, boring view of education it suggested — sitting in front of lectures, absorbing the knowledge =/= education.
And I’m a known lecture defender, but seriously – what made college worth it for me was the people. And not just the faculty, though they were important, but my peers as well.
Which is why I think, on one level, that I couldn’t stop thinking about this community-teaching model after seeing it this morning. Because it’s using technology to develop the community, but it gets at something that could only work on campus – that reflects part of why I love our campus community (and all of the campuses and communities I’ve been a part of). It gets at part of the reason why, even though I had to do a distance library degree, I chose a program where I had classmates.
Of course, I learned a lot from my classmates, and of course I learned a lot from my interactions with faculty. But even more than that – those relationships (especially with peers) are what created the culture of learning that existed in my college experience — the expectations, the standards, the ideas about what was worth your time and what weren’t – -those things were all social, shared values that we gave each other. Some campuses did it really well, building a culture that really pushed me beyond where I would have been on my own. Some, well, showed me how great I used to have it.
Even though I think it wouldn’t work – I keep trying to think about why it would. Because a college that developed the kind of culture where that kind of sharing and learning was possible, was rewarded, was considered important enough to do even alongside the classes you’re paying for — that would be really cool.