Guest Post! Speed friending in the Library

This is a guest post from my awesome colleague Laurie Bridges.  She’s been working hard over the last couple of years to expand and improve our outreach, instruction and programming for our very quickly growing international student population.

Laurie said that she had written up a lengthy description of her most recent innovation – a speed-friending event in the library that brings international students together with students from the U.S., so I asked her if she’d be willing to post it here.  She was, so here it is.


 

Librarian Laurie Bridges looking straight into the camera and smiling

Laurie Bridges, OSU Libraries & Press

Speed Friending!
Co-sponsored by the Valley Library & INTO OSU
Laurie Bridges (OSUL&P) and Mary Hughes (INTO OSU)

By Laurie Bridges, Instruction & Emerging Technologies Librarian

What we did

Approximately one year ago, I was passing through our University’s Memorial Union when I saw a poster advertising “Speed Friending.” The title, but none of the details, got lodged in my brain. Months later, while working with international students and listening to their stories, an idea popped into my head, “International students are in our library…maybe speed-friending would help them connect with domestic students.” I floated the idea by a few people, including Anne-Marie. Everyone I spoke with was supportive of the idea

(Note: it probably helped that our library’s strategic plan includes working toward “building community” within the library.)

To gather more information, and hopefully a plan, I contacted the Memorial Union to find out who had sponsored the speed-friending event the previous year. The staff looked through their calendar, and found no record of it. I then went online and googled “speed-friending” where I found a few mentions of the idea, some advertisements, but no information about how to organize and run such an event. Despite this setback, I mentioned the idea to a program manager at INTO OSU (our international English language program), Mary Hughes, and she was incredibly enthusiastic about the idea. We collaborated on the first event winter term, and held a second event spring term.

We plan to continue with one speed-friending event each term. In addition, the College of Business and the College of Engineering are meeting with Mary and I this summer, and may possibly host speed-friending events for their domestic and international students in the fall.

The most difficult part of the event is getting American students to register and then finding the “hook” to get them there; this is in large part why we offer free pizza and host the event in the evening around dinner time.

Why it matters

Libraries are often viewed as “safe” spaces on college and university campuses; they are spaces where students of all backgrounds come together to study and socialize. Libraries can and should have a role in helping students create an inclusive campus environment. We should all take steps to help prevent misunderstanding and create cultural bridges in our libraries.

After the jump

The rest of this post is my “brain dump” about the events, organizing, planning, and assessing. Hopefully this will help more campuses and librarians organize their own speed-friending events and improve on the format and structure we have created.

(And please, send any ideas you have for improvement: Laurie.Bridges @ oregonstate.edu).

students sitting on either side of a long, rectangular table laughing and talking

Photo courtesy of INTO OSU (Facebook)

Speed-Friending Event #1

Preplanning and promotion:

  • First we secured a room in the library that could seat up to 48 students at long tables. We decided to cap registration at 24 international students and 24 domestic students.
  • We scheduled the event for the third Wednesday of Winter term (we have a three term system).
  • A graphic designer at INTO OSU made a small flyer to be distributed via social media (posted on the INTO OSU Facebook page, Library Facebook page, and INTO OSU Instagram page). Another advertisement was posted in all residence halls, in the Memorial Union, and in the library. Promotion began 2 weeks before the event. The flyer had a bit.ly address that took students to the registration page (a Qualtrics survey to be explained later). We also sent out an announcement on applicable university listservs, it was announced in INTO OSU classes, and at the last minute Mary and I contacted OSU instructors teaching intercultural-themed classes to disseminate information to students; this seemed to result in a last minute surge of American/domestic students registering (they were lagging far behind the international).

Qualtrics Survey

Because we only had room for 48 students, and wanted an even split between American/domestic students and international, I used the library’s subscription to Qualtrics survey software to setup an event registration page that allowed for “quotas”.

  • I set the “quota” for 24 international and 24 domestic. This process was not without a few glitches, but overall did what we needed.
  • Once the quota was reached for each population, students were directed to a second survey telling them the event was full and asking if they’d like to join a waiting list.
  • The Qualtrics registration asked students:
    • Are you International or American/domestic?
    • Based on the response to question one, the Qualtrics survey branched to a question about asking for their home state or country.
    • The last question asked for an email address.

Email reminders

The day before the event, I sent reminders to the domestic students and Mary sent reminders to the international students. In the email I indicated, “If you have had a change of plans or are unable to attend, please let me know ASAP!.” Surprisingly, this resulted in an avalanche of cancellations from the domestic students—10 of the 24 registered students cancelled! Obviously sending a reminder the day before is extremely important; if I hadn’t sent the reminder, I think we would have been in dire straits and we would have had a lot of disappointed international students.

The Event itself

When the event day arrived, we had an almost even mix of international and domestic students – but there were two more international students than domestic. This meant that Mary and I sat in on the event and got to speak with international students, which was incredibly fun.

The Speed Friending event started at 6:00 with a planned conclusion time of 8:00. We had 40 participants (including Mary and myself). A total of 10 students were no-show; six domestic and four international.

The seating arrangement for the event worked well, although the acoustics in the room made hearing somewhat difficult. However, the excitement in the room was palpable and students didn’t seem to mind the elevated noise. We had each international student meet with each domestic student for four minutes. When it was time to switch partners we  simply turned on and off the lights in the room. Four minutes of talking with each student resulted in 90 minutes of talking. Because I participated I can say it was exhausting (I can only imagine speaking a second language)!

We split the cost of pizza, salad, and drinks with INTO OSU, which was delivered 90 minutes into the event. At that time, students sat wherever they wanted and continued conversations. Note: Many of our international students hail from Saudi Arabia, and because of dietary restrictions, it’s especially important to order extra vegetarian options.

Table Setup

graphic representation of two long tables with international students on one side and domestic students on the other

Here’s how the tables were setup (this is in no way to scale). The domestic/American students are represented by the red squares. They rotated every 4 minutes while the international students stayed in the same seats.

Photos

Photos were taken during the event and posted online afterward. In addition, these photos were used to advertise the Spring speed-friending event.

Assessment

Students were sent a survey one day after the event. 16 students filled out the survey and all responses were extremely positive. The only complaint was one respondent who didn’t like pizza. Several suggestions were given, including more time for talking with each partner and a possible follow-up event to gather the same group of people together.

Speed Friending Event #2

The second speed-friending event was a repeat of the first format, but with a few alterations based on our observations and student feedback:

  1. We had a smaller group.
    1. The first event was so loud that we were looking for ways to dampen the noise.
    2. 32 students were registered and a total of six students did not show up.
    3. In addition, four international students came to stand at the door, and wait to see if there was room for them (Mary has told me the international students really want to make more American friends—the registration for international students was full in less than a day and over seventy international students tried to register).
    4. In addition to less students, we also put whiteboards-on-wheels between the two rows of tables to dampen the noise – this seemed to work very well.
  2. We split the event into two halves.
    1. The first half was spent “speed friending” and students talked with their partners for six minutes each, more time than the previous event. However, this means students didn’t get to meet everyone from the opposite group.
    2. After an hour, students took a break to grab pizza and were told to sit four to a group (two International and two American).  They worked in groups to answer trivia questions.
    3. Although splitting the session into two halves worked well, we’re still exploring possibilities for a more fun activity for the second half.
  3. Multiple promotion strategies.
    1. Connecting with instructors seemed to help bring in the most domestic students.
    2. In addition, OSU has a student run Facebook page called, “Things Overheard at OSU” and a number of domestic students registered after I posted an announcement for the event on the page. However, my posting did not fit into the pages guidelines, and it was removed a day later.
  4. Timing of evaluations.
    1. I sent out the assessment survey a week after the event, this was apparently too late, because I only received four responses.
    2. However, all responses were positive. In the future, I will send the survey out the day after the event.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s