pointing out those giants, there with the shoulders

So back in April, gg at Skulls in the Stars challenged science bloggers across the disciplines to read and research some classic article in their discipline, and then write a blog post about it.  The results are in, and they’re awesome.  Not just fascinating - this is a potential time suck (with none of the [...]

Why we should read it before we cite it — no, really!

Last week, Female Science Professor wrote a lovely pair of posts about scholars and scholarship, what it feels like when your work has an impact on someone and what it feels like to meet the people who have influenced you in that particular undefinable way where it’s hard to even express what they’ve meant to [...]

LOTW follow-up - from people who weren’t there!

Kate and I are still buzzing from the great conversation we had with the people who came to our session at LOEX of the West. It’s always an amazing and kind of surreal experience when you find out that other people are excited by the same ideas you are.
And it seems that other people [...]

LOEX of the West presentation, 2008

Peer Review 2.0: Tomorrow’s Scholarship for Today’s Students
LOEX of the West, Las Vegas

Anne-Marie Deitering & Kate Gronemyer

WEB 2.0 BACKGROUND
Five Web 2.0 themes — from the ACRL Instruction Section’s Current Issues Discussion Forum, Research Instruction in a Web 2.0 World (Annual, 2006).
DANAH BOYD EXAMPLES
{Edit: These didn’t make it into the presentation, but they are examples of [...]

All about the intersection of scholarship and peer review around here

all the time.  That’s because Kate and I are deep in preparation for our Loex of the West talk and it’s hard to think about anything else.  A few things that have come out of my work in the last few days.
This video at Kairos - This is Scholarship –
This video cuts across a lot [...]

Teaching undergraduates about peer review - how and why, and did I mention how?

Lately I’ve noticed a number of different conversations I’ve been having coalescing around the question of evaluation - how can students evaluate the information they find. Some of the conversations have been versions of your normal standard “information on the web can be bad” and aren’t very interesting, but more of them have been [...]

writing for publication - on getting it done (with a little why we do it)

Do academic librarians have a love-hate relationship with academic writing?  I mean, we spend a lot of time explaining how to find scholarly articles to our students, and hopefully we also get to spend some time telling them why they should want to?   But that doesn’t always translate into “scholarly writing YAY” when it comes [...]

open access (go Harvard!) and peer review

After seeing versions of this headline — At Harvard, a Proposal to Publish Free on the Web — all day yesterday in my feeds I was actually waiting with bated breath to see what the outcome of the vote would be. Weren’t you? Okay, probably not. But some people wrote the [...]

scholarship and peer review and 2.0

Over the last few days, i’ve been seeing some similar projects popping up on the landscape — or, rather, fairly different projects tied together by a common thread. The thread is one of particular interest to me - how will things like peer review and traditional media publishing integrate with new ways of communicating [...]