Last year, Rachel and I reported on a survey we did the year before that looked at how librarians feel about different social software applications like blogs, wikis and the like (is that right? I think so – it’s a really long time ago now). We mainly found out that we should have asked some different questions, which is what always happens when I do surveys.
But there was one thing that was really, really striking – most people reported not doing a ton of social networking (and I’m talking about things like blogs and wikis, not Facebook. And this was 2 years ago so things have probably changed). But in terms of how often people have edited a wiki, for example, I bet things haven’t changed that much.
Anyway, most librarians weren’t doing a ton of social networking. AND YET —
Almost everyone (97%) reported that they liked exploring new technologies.
Almost everyone (85%) reported that they were encouraged at work to explore new technologies.
And this is the big one – almost everyone (70%) reported that they had enough time to explore new technologies.
And yet. They weren’t doing it. So we theorized that the reason for this was a time issue, but it wasn’t the time issue that people usually talked about. Setting up accounts, figuring out how tools work — librarians have time to do that. That part is easy. The hard part for most of us is the time it takes to actually engage with a new group of people (or put together enough of the old group of people to make it worthwhile).
And I’ve certainly found that to be the case.
Which is a long way of saying – I actually looked at my Twitter account today. I know, right? I have said in multiple presentations that I don’t use Twitter, and I don’t. But as is the case with many other things that require accounts – I have one. So the second Pengrin story launched today and there’s a Twitter component. That was apparently all it took. Just like this whole experiment means I can choose to just read stories and not really play the ARG, this story means I can just read stories and not really have to do all of that work that it would take to make Twitter fun.
I enjoyed the first story quite a bit but I’m expecting to really have fun reading this one. It’s blog-based (young character = LJ, parental characters = wordpress), the emo teen-ish character makes an Emily the Strange reference in her first paragraph and a Twin Peaks reference in the third — and as an extra added bonus for me there’s a slowly evolving meta conversation in the comments.
I don’t know the classic book it’s connected to – The Haunted Doll’s House, but Slice does have a creepy doll picture representing it on the main site, which is awesome.
So this is apparently what it takes to get me to invest some energy in Twitter, at least for today. It will be interesting to see if I feel like I “get” Twitter any better at the end of this week than I do right now. It usually takes real engagement with a social tool like this for me to understand its cool factor. That usually happens right about the time I start to notice that the tool is changing something about how I think about something on the web – whether that something is information, other people, or whatever. I suspect this won’t be enough to do it, but I’ve been wrong before.
It was this post today on Unit Structures that really got me thinking about all of these connections. Because this isn’t all to say that I don’t get why lots of people do like Twitter – I actually do. But I think there’s some truth in the guess Rachel and I made about our survey data — that sometimes even when the social or informational or educational or other payoff is there for the taking, developing new social networks takes work, and energy — and sometimes we have to pick and choose where to spend it.
info-fetishist 
Oddly, I’ve had a twitter account since–just had to check–September and have just started using it this week because I met several local people IRL who use it and I wanted to play too. Partially I was resisting because I don’t need any more ways to procrastinate, but mostly it was because I didn’t really know many people who used it and it feels a little creepy to just start “following” people, even if it is all out in public. There are other reasons too (Seriously, no one wants to know what I’m doing most of the time. I’m really, really boring) but tapping in to the social network I’m already a part of somewhere else is key.
Kate – yes! That’s exactly what I’m talking about . In my case, I think I have lots of people I know using Twitter, but it would be a matter of finding them, asking them to connect, the social angst of “maybe they don’t want to connect” as well as the time it takes to do that — it all adds up.
Another example – I just joined Ravelry and when I realized that the first step was uploading photos and entering info about myself I almost thought — “oh no – too much effort.” And it was worse because I couldn’t seem to find anyone I know there (even though I know they’re there). If I hadn’t found a couple of baby things patterns almost immediately to knit for the approximately one million babies I know who are coming soon – I might not have spent that hour making my Ravelry profile look real, you know? And as it is, I’ve done the minimum.