Peer Review 2.0: Tomorrow’s Scholarship for Today’s Students
LOEX of the West, Las Vegas
Anne-Marie Deitering & Kate Gronemyer
WEB 2.0 BACKGROUND
Five Web 2.0 themes — from the ACRL Instruction Section’s Current Issues Discussion Forum, Research Instruction in a Web 2.0 World (Annual, 2006).
DANAH BOYD EXAMPLES
{Edit: These didn’t make it into the presentation, but they are examples of some discussions on the web over the last year that started our thinking on this topic.}
danah boyd – open-access is the future: boycott locked-down academic journals
- good response from Ann Galloway – Boycott? I think not. (Purse Lip Square Jaw)
- response thread on AIR-L (Association of Internet Researchers)
danah boyd – Viewing American Class Divisions through Facebook and MySpace
- Response from Andrew Keating – ‘Digital Divide’ meets Web 2.0? Ridiculous and Poorly Written Article
- Short discussion at TeleRead
- BBC article – “Social Sites Reveal Class Divide”
danah boyd – editing a special issue of JCMC
NORMAL SCIENCE & INNOVATIONS
- Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
- The Paradigm Concept — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Coping with Peer Rejection – Nature
PEER REVIEW, QUALITY CONTOL & FRAUD
- Fiona Godlee (et al), “Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking them to Sign their Reports,” JAMA, 280 (1998)
- Scientific Misconduct: Bell Labs Fires Physicist Found Guilty of Forging Data, Science (4 October 2002)
DISTRIBUTING PROFESSIONAL REWARDS
- 2006 Report of the MLA Task Force on Evaluation Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion (opens in PDF)
- This is Scholarship (video). Catherine C. Braun & Kenneth L. Gilbert, KAIROS, volume 12:3
- Piled Higher and Deeper (webcomic)
WHAT IF WE IGNORE NEW MODELS?
- Michael Gorman, Jabberwiki: The Educational Response, Part II
NEW MODELS
Expressive Processing: An Experiment in Blog-Based Peer Review – Noah Waldrip Fruin on Grand Text Auto
ScienceBlogs – The World’s Largest Conversation about Science
BPR3: Bloggers for Peer-Reviewed Research Reporting — Icons
Open Notebook Science Using Blogs and Wikis (Jean-Claude Bradley, at Nature Precedings)
“The Academic Manuscript” — Wicked Anomie: Sociology Run Amok
EDITED TO ADD:
Barbara Fister points to this article in the Chronicle: Certifying Online Research (Gary Olson), about the challenges of evaluating online publications. See also Barbara’s post at ACRLog: Peer (to Peer) Review.
This is precisely the type of work my pupils should be producing.
Congratulations on your exhaustive research,
A for execution.